Back Roads to Far Dwellings, Single Track, with Pausing Places by Vetch and Clover

'The Ripe Field', William Crozier, 1989, Courtesy Flowers Galleries 

The Hundred Thousand Places, Thomas A. Clark, 96 pp. Carcanet Press, £9.95

'Very few men know how to take a walk.' Dr Johnson usually has something definite to say whatever the topic, and what we might call the Johnson Doctrine on walking (from No. 5 of his aptly titled essay series, The Rambler) goes like this: 'It ought to be the endeavour of every man to derive his reflections from the objects about him; for it is to no purpose that he alters his position, if his attention continues fixed to the same point. The mind should be kept open to the access of every new idea, and so far disengaged from the predominance of particular thoughts, as easily to accommodate itself to occasional entertainment.' Thomas A. Clark's view of walking, as he explained it in an interview titled 'Making Spaces' published in Oxford Poetry in 1993, is very similar in spirit if less grandiloquent in style:

I do a great deal of walking from day to day and I find that it clears my head, while it quite literally puts me in touch with my surroundings. At the same time walking is an adventure, a direction. It's leaving everything you know and setting

out into the world. . . If we have been given the gift of the world, the very least we can do in return is to give it our attention. I think that one of the main concerns of poetry, and of all art, is openness, laying yourself open to fresh experience, actively going towards it.

The Hundred Thousand Places is Clark's latest book-length act of attention to the gift of the world, eighty-four minimalist poems, each of them open to the particulars of fresh experience, the records of a mind selflessly accommodating itself to the 'occasional entertainment' of the seashores, lochs, mountains, stones, running water, creatures, plants, and weather of the Scottish highlands and islands.

The book is in four parts, and the poems range in length from three to seventeen short lines; we encounter them at the rate of one per page, with plenty of white space around each of them. The first part consists of twenty-four poems, and begins with dawn ('once again / for the first time / morning') and sea mist 'closing / every distance'; the mist lifts, colour ('the first / candour') appears, and soon we are walking 'out / into space / as to / an appointment' with a world bright with the specificity of flowers, grasses, and birds. We encounter no fewer than twenty-three different plants in this section, plants whose names have their own poetry - gorse flower, primrose, bird's foot trefoil, thrift, campion, thyme, clover, heather, bugloss, lyme grass, orpine, sorrel, sea kale, thistle, asphodel, milkwort, eyebright, ling, water-mint, vetch, bog cotton, honeysuckle, and dog rose - and in the context of the poem each naming is an act of attention, a noticing of 'lovely particulars / brighter than their names'. We also encounter birds: lapwing, snipe, cormorant, herring gull, redshank, plover, lark, and corncrake, an ornithological series which culminates (in the last poem of the first part) in a moment reminiscent of Basho at his most austere:

at leisure a shape

lifts from rock and flaps

out over wastes

a few wing beats

taking it far

The walking in the first part of the book takes place in balmy, spring-like weather and in the relatively gentle setting of beach, headland, dune, and machair, with a turn away from the sea into a quiet glen of 'thistledown and bog cotton' just before the end of the section; in the second part, a sequence of thirty poems separated from the first part by two blank pages, the going gets much tougher, as we move into highland country, a mountain world of 'blackland and moorland / grassland and acid heath', of 'constantly / spilling water', of steep slopes and a difficult ascent, of 'vistas" and 'desolations', followed by a return across a moor, past a small loch, and through a pine forest. There is a very different ecosystem here: this is a place of moor grass, moss, dry whin thorns, grey lichens, heather, and dwarf juniper, and, in contrast to the profusion of colour in the first part of the poem, the only flowers noticed in this environment are tormentil, a single violet, and butterwort, the 'purple flower / of emptiness':

a basal rosette

of carnivorous leaves

the flower single

on a slender stalk


waiting

in emptiness

In the third part, the going gets easier again: at the beginning of this twenty-poem sequence we enter 'a steep-sided glen', where we go 'on and on / deeper into green / led by implication'. Here we have entered the comfort of woodland, a place of bog myrtle, birch saplings, alders, and numerous other trees:

a hanging valley

of ash, wych elm, hazel

willow, birch, oak


dense cover of beech

light shade of ash

 

wintergreen, ramsons

sweet woodruff

guelder rose

 

hair moss, bracken

fork moss, oak fern

reindeer moss

 

The Marvellian adjective green appears frequently in this section, and, although there is a brief, four-page episode during the walk when we 'move among stones', these stones have been softened by green, by 'moss growing over them / trees breaking through them', until a shoulder-height boulder seems to be a miniature, Japanese-style landscape 'with moss-covered ledges / ridges and ravines'. The section ends with a return of flowers, a shed skin, a tumble-down emblem of the transience of human endeavour (even if it is an emblem which is robust and un-allegorical enough to rest one's back against), and a finally achieved serenity, the coming to fruition of many years' experience:

it has taken half a lifetime

to learn to sit in the sun

among primroses and violets

beside a dried adder skin

your back to a broken wall

 

After the freshness of the morning seashore, the rigours of midday on the high moors and the mountains, and the rich woodland pleasures of the afternoon, in the fourth part of the book we descend to the evening and to the lowlands:

coming down the hill

you are tall

take it easy

lean back

against the slope

 

the places

you have been

come with you

you bring experience

to evening air

 

We are back by the seashore, but the atmosphere is very different from when we started: 'the hill that was bright / is now dark'. This is the shortest part of the book (it is only ten poems long), and it contains the most austere, sometimes even wintry, imagery. In the penultimate poem we arrive at a place where steps descend into water:

 

by an old mooring

a few steps

carved out of rock

go down to water

 

as if you might

step down into the sea

into another knowledge

wild and cold

 

There is here, I think, a conscious echo of Elizabeth Bishop's great imaginative descent into 'the clear gray icy water' in 'At the Fishhouses', where the chilly seawater in the harbour at Great Village in Newfoundland is characterised as being 'like what we imagine knowledge to be: / dark, salt, clear, moving, utterly free', a wild and cold embodiment of the inhospitable otherness of a planet we can only turn into our home through the use of imagination. Regardless of whether this is an allusion to, or just a parallel with, Bishop's poem, at this moment in Clark's book, the image has, for all the understatement in Clark's handling of it, a similar force and resonance to the closing lines of Bishop's poem, and it is this resonance which prepares us for the final page:

far out in the dusk

where qualities mingle

a figure is standing

at the tide's edge

The simultaneous open-endedness and finality of this, the sense of being situated on the border of some kind of different quality of experience, is reinforced by the sudden use of the third person to describe the walker. Throughout the book, the third-person orientation has been reserved for observed and named aspects of the environment, while the walker - both the speaker and by implication the reader - has always been referred to by the second-person pronoun 'you'. Here on the final page, though, the walker is made distant and given a new objectivity: the 'you' of speaker and reader alike is transformed into an image with equivalent status to all the other images we have encountered throughout the book, and we are left in the end just with 'a figure' standing alone in the dusk at the shifting edge of the world.

Describing the book in the way I have been doing, almost as if it were a record of a single day's walk and, by implication, a narrative which suggests that the four parts of this day might stand for the four seasons, or even for four stages in a life (the colours and flowers of childhood, the vigour of early maturity, the earned relaxation of late maturity, the bleak knowledge of old age), runs the danger of making the book sound more schematic than it is. The writing in fact avoids allegory in a number of ways. One is that, although the book is divided into four parts corresponding to segments of the daylight hours, it would, I think, be impossible to cover the mileage suggested by the descriptions in a single day. It seems rather that this is an anthology of moments from numerous walks which have been allowed to cluster together in groups according to the time of day, type of landscape, and atmosphere which they portray. Thus, there is no straightforward, step-by-step narrative in any of the parts and, just as there is no knowing what you might see as a path crests a hill or emerges from trees, there is similarly no knowing what you might find next as you turn a page. Occasionally there are little runs of poems that go together to make a clearly connected mini-sequence, such as the five poems about 'rushing, dashing' mountain streams on pages 38-42, but the poem that follows on page 43 provides a drastic change of topic and perspective:

as you turn a corner

of the forest path

the face the mountain

looms up before you

 

it knocks you back

for a moment

the force of it

straddling the path

 

you must gather

your wits and go

forward in a new

imposition of scale

 

The relation between individual poems may thus be one of continuity and development, or, as here, one of contrast and surprise - or sometimes it is just a matter of 'nextness', as the movement from page to page mimics the intermittent, always unpredictable ways in which moments of fresh perception occur as one moves through an environment ('if you move / lightly / events will start / up from your feet').

The most important way in which the poem avoids symbolism and allegory, though, is through the intensity of its focus on specific things: the writing is in love with particulars ('through crushed water-mint / through particulars you come / to a blue boat moored / beside purple vetch'). Thus, even though I have occasionally suggested that an image might have some symbolic resonance (the 'snake skin', the 'broken wall'), the key point about these images is that they are first of all (and even finally) things perceived in the world: an actual snake skin, an actual broken wall. The poems' notations of things, processes, creatures, and small events in the world are both evocative and accurate ('a breeze / of small birds / moving through / birch leaves'), but it is often enough just to acknowledge the existence of things by listing their names; the poem about the trees in the hanging valley which I quoted earlier is one good example, and here is another:

between sea and sky

drifts of bugloss

a blue butterfly

lifting from the lyme grass

 

cormorant and herring gull

orpine and clover

sorrel and sea kale

redshank and plover

 

Here a minimal account of a butterfly's movement and a list of simple names are delicately bound together by the (half-)rhyme scheme, and by alliteration and assonance ('drifts / lifting', 'cormorant / orpine / sorrel'), into a moment of unified perception.

Detail is all, both in the perception of the world and in the line-by-line, phrase-by-phrase handling of the language; as another seashore poem in the first part puts it:

sunshine its climate

openness its aspect

detail its pleasure

 

the fields are drenched

in lark song

in detail

in dew

 

The attention to linguistic detail and the small shifts in emphasis in the parallelism of the second stanza here are typical of the understated pleasures to be had from Clark's writing; the effect of a poem or a stanza often depends on this kind of minimal disturbance to the language. As another example:

along back roads

to far dwellings

single track

with pausing places

by vetch and clover

 

Here, in addition to the allusion to Basho's Narrow Road to the Deep North in the first two lines (or perhaps more specifically to Cid Corman's translation of it, which he titled Back Roads to Far Towns), we notice that this single-track road is not equipped with journey-facilitating 'passing places' but with 'pausing places' nicely situated to allow us to stop and observe the roadside flowers. The pause we make in our reading as we notice this minimal alteration to the language mimics the pause we make in our journey to attend to the lowly flowers.

Thus, although the book does have an over-arching shape which frames the specifics to which the writing attends so closely, this frame is not a rigid or constraining one, nor does it over-thematise observed particularities or bully them into becoming symbols; the frame is shapely enough to provide a sense of fullness and completion to the book as a whole, while simultaneously being open enough to allow unpredicted perceptions, especially visual ones, to register clearly on consciousness. With Clark's writing, what you get is very much what you see:

 

as far as you can go

over the machair

there is only surface

 

it is a plane

of appearance

where nothing

is deferred

 

lacking depth

you walk on the richly

embroidered ground

 

There is only surface; nothing is deferred; walker and world alike lack depth, whether psychological or metaphysical; and we walk on the richly embroidered plane of appearance that is, happily, enough.

It must be clear by now that I think this is an engaging and enjoyable book, celebratory in impulse, with a shapely structure, and full of local pleasures. It is not easy to say whether it is better than - or not as good as - his earlier books such as The Path to the Sea or Tormentil and Bleached Bones; in terms of the quality of his writing, Clark is nothing if not steady, and his books, poems, even individual lines, seem to exist in a democracy of value.

There does remain, however, the question of the book's exclusions. How much time do most of us spend in situations of such Arcadian serenity? What is the relevance of such writing to us as we go about our business in the cities (or even the working landscapes) where we live and earn our livings? Don't the highlands and islands of Scotland have an (often fiercely contested) history? Don't they have an economy? In other words, isn't there a danger that these poems are pastoral in the worst sense, that is, that they are escapist simplifications of the rural and the wild?

It is true that in the history of English poetry there has been much writing about place where the non-urban has been idealised for ideological purposes; the seventeenth-century country-house poems of Jonson, Carew, and Herrick spring to mind as examples. Raymond Williams, John Barrell, and many others have examined in detail the way in which the idea of 'landscape' has been historically constructed, usually to the disadvantage of those who actually live in the place being described; thus, the uncomfortable social and economic realities that allowed the creation of the 'earthly paradise' of Penshurst are efficiently masked by the way Jonson portrays the house and its grounds in the poem.

This emphasis on ideology is not the whole story, however. It is undeniably true that people do go walking in non-urban spaces, and that they experience and enjoy those places in various ways, and that many of those experiences are marked by a non-exploitative immediacy which is attentive to the details of the environment taken on its own terms. As Bonnie Costello puts it in the introduction to Shifting Ground, her book on twentieth-century American landscape poets, the persistence of the kind of argument put forward by Williams, Barrell, and others 'may be a necessary reaction to the idealization of nature that obscured the real violence done to the environment, not to mention human subjugation and suffering', but it nevertheless 'ignores other impulses in landscape (aesthetic, religious, biological, psychological)'; what she says she herself wishes to explore in her book is an alternative tradition of landscape poetry, represented by poets such as Frost, Stevens, Moore, Clampitt, Ammons, and Ashbery, which is 'not possessive but experiential in its motives', and which 'cultivates open engagement' with the world as it is perceived and experienced.

Clark himself sees his own work much in this way. When asked about the relation between walking and writing in his work in 'Standing Still and Walking in Strath Nethy', an interview with Alec Finlay originally published in the Edinburgh Review in 1995, he comments that 'both the poems and the walks are in answer to a movement of desire - for clear air, silence, responsiveness, in the midst of a life, no different from anybody's life, in which these are largely absent.' He goes on to say that he is 'completely puzzled by the inability of some people to see this desire in the poems':

Literary intellectuals in particular are quite blinded by the absences in my poems. It's as if you can't mention a hill unless you have access to it by way of a street, unless you mention the acid rain that falls on it, that it has an absentee landlord, and so on. For them, nature is problematic and can only be located, if at all, by way of a critique of culture. But I would maintain that we can't begin to know ourselves except in relation to everything that is not ourselves. It's in order to focus on this relation that so much is excluded from my work.

Clark is thus not a poet of damage but of recuperation; his exclusions are a consciously chosen way of keeping 'contemporary pressures . . . outside the brackets so to speak, so that there can be concentration on a few primary concerns.' His exclusive focus on the non-urban thus need not be seen as narrow. As he goes on to say, there are 'plenty of writers who are sharp and penetrating in denunciation of a pretty dreadful condition'; Clark does not dismiss such writers, but neither, on the other hand, does he accept that a metropolitan focus on the urban, the social, the political, and the damaged should be obligatory. Perhaps what we actually need are more writers who keep available the possibility of humane and celebratory alternatives to the urban, a point nicely made by the title of the Edinburgh Review interview, which wittily grants a peaty valley in the Cairngorms ('slow going', 'rather boggy', 'occasional patches of slop', according to recent hiking blogs) the same cultural centrality and status as Manhattan through its allusion to Standing Still and Walking in New York, the collection of prose writings by that quintessentially metropolitan poet, Frank O'Hara.

The title of his Oxford Poetry interview is similarly suggestive. 'Making Spaces' can mean the construction of spaces, implying that each small poem is 'a thing made', a meticulously crafted aesthetic space for a reader's imagination to inhabit, but it can also refer to the act of making space for something, creating a clearing in one's life in which one can be reminded of and attend to something valuable that is not always available in our socially, politically, and economically constrained everyday experience.

There is perhaps a parallel here - albeit on a much smaller scale and in a minor key - with the defence of Arcadian poetry made by Czeslaw Milosz in the context of a discussion of the responsibilities of Polish literature among the ruins of 1946: he argued that 'sometimes the world may lose its face' and become 'too base', and that in such circumstances, Arcadian poetry (and by extension, I suggest, the kind of minimalist pastoral poetry that is Clark's speciality) can have a vital role as 'an indication that the world need not always be like this; it can be different.'

Thus, although in one sense the word 'escapist' may be 'correctly pejorative', as Clark admits, he nevertheless goes on to argue that 'what that use of the term also implies is that there is no escape, and it seems to me that that is a cruelty. . . . There are some situations in which one needs to escape. If one lives in a crowded culture it might be useful to have images of empty landscapes, broader spaces.' That is just what The Hundred Thousand Places provides: it allows us to walk in our imaginations through eighty-four 'little spaces of quiet where things can be seen clearly'.